Mithrandir Metrics
2026-10-16T03:35:59.884722+00:00ok
Section IV / Lab / Experiments and follow-ups

A workshop, not a dashboard.

A directory for experiments and player diagnostics. The index stays navigational; deep strike-zone and percentile work belongs on the player profiles.

Rows
8
Pitchers
33
Hitters
63
Generated 2026-10-16T03:35:59.884722+00:00 Outings 48 Window 2026-10-01 / 2026-10-15
Optimization diagnostic report

Tyler Glasnow LAD

Tyler Glasnow's tools (50) and production (49) are aligned. Primary finding: existing slider is present, but its movement shape does not currently cover the desired gloveside-sweep window. Also flagged: Stuff-to-Whiff Gap (Command); Usage Underuse: Knuckle Curve. Most actionable fix: increase knuckle curve usage to at least league-average for that pitch type.

50Tools 49Production 34Score
ride armside gloveside +Stuff-to-Whiff Gap (Command) +Arsenal Shape: Gloveside Sweep
Pregame Scouting Report / starter vs a full lineup
New · starter vs lineup

Scout the whole lineup.

Pick a starter and an opposing team and get the pregame report: the top threats, the easiest outs and exactly which pitch to attack each hitter with, and the sleeper the box score hides, a low-average bat who quietly grades up against this exact arsenal. Click any name for the full 3D dissection.

Open the Scouting Report →
Comp Constellation / similar hitters, and why
New · profile-shape similarity

Map a hitter's constellation.

Pick any hitter and see who is built like him: a star map where the closest profiles orbit nearest, sized and colored by how alike they really are, over six weighted feature groups from contact quality to sprint speed. Hover a star for why the two agree, click for the radial fingerprint overlay, and follow any comp to his card, projection, or swing lab. A hitter with no true twin gets an honest sparse sky, never a forced match.

Open the Comp Constellation →
Matchup Dissector / pitcher arsenal vs hitter holes
New · any pitcher vs any hitter

Dissect the confrontation.

Pick any pitcher and any hitter and break the at-bat down pitch by pitch in 3D: every pitch in the arsenal flying to the plate with real movement, how often it's thrown, its whiff rate, and exactly where the hitter ranks against that family. The out pitch surfaces itself, the matchup lean is priced against league average, and the holes light up in red.

Open the Matchup Dissector →
3D Pitch Lab / batter-POV tunnel viewer
New · interactive 3D

See the tunnel in three dimensions.

Every pitch type's real average flight, reconstructed from Statcast physics and rendered in true 3D from the batter's eye. Orbit the scene, snap to camera presets, and watch the paths share a tunnel before they break apart. Search any pitcher, overlay their best-breaking variants, and export a branded still.

Open the 3D Pitch Lab →
3D Swing Simulator / bat-tracking swing viewer
New · interactive 3D

Watch the swing in three dimensions.

Any hitter's real bat-tracking swing, reconstructed in 3D: an animated batter sweeping his true swing plane, with attack angle, swing-path tilt, attack direction and bat speed annotated against the MLB average. When our optimization model sees a flat path, the recommended swing overlays as a dashed target you can orbit around.

Open the 3D Swing Simulator →
Hitter optimization / swing and decision variants
Hitter optimization

Swing path and decision map

Jake Bauers's tools (69) outpace production (58) by 12 points. Primary finding: high exit velocity but low barrel rate — bat-to-ball efficiency is leaving power on the table. Also flagged: Launch Angle Too High; Passive In-Zone Approach.

See full optimization →

See the swing in 3D →

Launch Angle Too High
-17.5° Current 38° → Target 20°

Flatten swing plane to bring average LA into the 15-22° window

Solid = current angle. Dotted = recommended window.
Passive In-Zone Approach
Pass Attack Pass Attack Attack Attack Pass Attack Pass

Increase in-zone swing rate, especially on fastballs in favorable counts

Hittable takes / Expansion guardrail
Experiment runs / optimization candidates
01 Hagen Smith pitcher / optimization read Score83.7 FixHIGH HIGH 02 Robbie Ray pitcher / optimization read Score60.0 FixHIGH HIGH 03 Anthony Kay pitcher / optimization read Score57.8 FixHIGH MEDIUM 04 Garrett Mitchell hitter / optimization read Score54.1 FixHIGH MEDIUM 05 Jacob Misiorowski pitcher / optimization read Score53.5 FixMEDIUM HIGH 06 Shohei Ohtani hitter / optimization read Score52.6 FixMEDIUM MEDIUM
Pitcher diagnostics / tools-production gaps
HS

Hagen Smith

CWS · Arsenal Gap: Armside Drop

84Score 67Tools +17.8Gap

Hagen Smith's tools grade (67) outpaces production (49) by 18 points. Primary diagnosis: no armside drop pitch (changeup/splitter) — platoon vulnerability vs opposite-hand hitters. Secondary signals: Arsenal Shape: Gloveside Sweep; Usage Underuse: Cutter. High-fixability path: develop a changeup to cover the armside-drop region.

RR

Robbie Ray

SD · Stuff-to-Whiff Gap (Tunneling)

60Score 29Tools -9.2Gap

Robbie Ray's production (39) outpaces the tools grade (29) by 9 points. Primary diagnosis: elite raw stuff but poor pitch tunneling — hitters read pitches early. Secondary signals: Arsenal Shape: Armside Drop; Arsenal Shape: Gloveside Sweep. High-fixability path: pair pitches with tighter release-point similarity and greater late movement divergence.

AK

Anthony Kay

CWS · Stuff-to-Whiff Gap (Tunneling)

58Score 42Tools +19.5Gap

Anthony Kay's tools grade (42) outpaces production (22) by 20 points. Primary diagnosis: elite raw stuff but poor pitch tunneling — hitters read pitches early. Secondary signals: Arsenal Gap: Gloveside Drop. High-fixability path: pair pitches with tighter release-point similarity and greater late movement divergence.

Jacob Misiorowski

MIL · Stuff-to-Whiff Gap (Command)

54Score 64Tools +1.2Gap

Jacob Misiorowski's tools grade (64) outpaces production (63) by 1 points. Primary diagnosis: existing slider is present, but its movement shape does not currently cover the desired gloveside-sweep window.. Secondary signals: Arsenal Shape: Gloveside Drop; Usage Underuse: Curveball. High-fixability path: increase curveball usage to at least league-average for that pitch type.

Hitter optimization / approach and contact-shape reads

Garrett Mitchell

MIL · Launch Angle Too Low

54Score 87Tools +25.4Gap

Garrett Mitchell's tools (87) outpace production (61) by 25 points. Primary finding: groundball-heavy approach with the raw power to drive the ball — leaving fly-ball damage on the table. Also flagged: Contact-Discipline Mismatch. Most actionable fix: elevate bat path to increase average launch angle toward 12-18° range.

Shohei Ohtani

LAD · Launch Angle Too High

53Score 89Tools +40.7Gap

Shohei Ohtani's tools (89) outpace production (48) by 41 points. Primary finding: expanding the zone too aggressively — generating weak contact and whiffs on pitcher's pitches. Also flagged: Launch Angle Too High; Contact-Discipline Mismatch.

RA

Ronald Acuña

ATL · Launch Angle Too Low

51Score 82Tools +23.1Gap

Ronald Acuña's tools (82) outpace production (58) by 23 points. Primary finding: groundball-heavy approach with the raw power to drive the ball — leaving fly-ball damage on the table. Also flagged: Contact-Discipline Mismatch. Most actionable fix: elevate bat path to increase average launch angle toward 12-18° range.

LL

Luis Lara

MIL · Power Efficiency Gap

51Score 70Tools +26.7Gap

Luis Lara's tools (70) outpace production (44) by 27 points. Primary finding: groundball-heavy approach with the raw power to drive the ball — leaving fly-ball damage on the table. Also flagged: Power Efficiency Gap. Most actionable fix: elevate bat path to increase average launch angle toward 12-18° range.

Compact hitter ledger
H01 Garrett Mitchell MIL / Launch Angle Too Low Score54.1 FixHIGH MEDIUM H02 Shohei Ohtani LAD / Launch Angle Too High Score52.6 FixMEDIUM MEDIUM H03 Ronald Acuña ATL / Launch Angle Too Low Score51.0 FixHIGH MEDIUM H04 Luis Lara MIL / Power Efficiency Gap Score50.6 FixMEDIUM LOW H05 J. T. Realmuto PHI / Power Efficiency Gap Score50.2 FixMEDIUM MEDIUM H06 Munetaka Murakami CWS / Power Efficiency Gap Score48.2 FixMEDIUM LOW
Arsenal decomposition / descriptive pitch mix
PitcherPitch mixPrimary diagnosisScore
Tyler GlasnowLAD FF 42% SI 24% KC 19% SL 16% Stuff-to-Whiff Gap (Command) 34
Shane DrohanMIL SI 56% SL 20% CU 12% FF 12% Stuff-to-Whiff Gap (Tunneling) 14
Gavin WilliamsCLE ST 34% FF 31% KC 28% SI 13% Arsenal Shape: Gloveside Drop 23
Griffin JaxTB SI 36% CH 25% CU 15% FF 12% Stuff-to-Whiff Gap (Command) 22
Blake SnellLAD FF 44% CU 27% CH 17% SL 13% Arsenal Shape: Arsenal Shape: Armside Drop 47
Robert GasserMIL SI 52% ST 25% CH 16% FF 8% Arsenal Gap: Gloveside Drop 26
Freddy PeraltaTB FF 70% CH 24% CU 9% Stuff-to-Whiff Gap (Command) 53
Parker MessickCLE FF 45% CH 28% SI 22% SL 4% No primary gap 1
Scenario library

Scenario library, not a fake simulator.

These are saved diagnostic shapes from the current artifact. Slider-based what-if simulation remains parked until a real server-side simulator is wired.

Pitcher arsenal gapMissing movement quadrant plus usage flag. Review on pitcher diagnostics.
Hitter approach gapTools-production separation with discipline or launch-angle diagnosis.
True follow-upArchive checks whether the later window moved toward the original thesis.
Saved queries / reusable rooms